6 years experience with X-Treme bags – comparison
Development in right direction
Previous slide
Next slide
| 9‘ x 75m Standard | 9‘ x 75m X-Treme | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| thickness | 215µm | 170µm | -21% |
| weight/bag | 133 kg | 105 kg | -21% |
| bags/palet | 8 pcs. | 10 pcs. | +25% |
| carbon footprint | 100% | 73% | -27%* |
| tensile strength at break MD/TD | 35/35 MPa | 40/40 MPa | |
| elongation at break MD/TD | 600%/700% | 600%/700% | |
| tear resistance | 12 gf/mic. | 15 gf/mic. | |
| impact resistance (dart drop) | 1.700 gr | 1.300 gr | |
| advantages | slightly higher properties | better handling | |
| 30 years of experience | reduction allows longer bags | ||
| reduced freight costs/bag | |||
| slightly lower properties | |||
| 6 years of experience |
Conclusion: both bags can be used for all kind of feed and grain. Initial reservations about the thickness-reduced X-Treme bags disappeared quickly due to best practical use.
*due to raw-material, energy, transport and storage savings
- 2021-02-08
Facebook
LinkedIn
Email
ULRICH KREBES
PURCHASING
SALES INTERNATIONAL
